Artiklar av Giovanni Gozzo

Innebär öppen utövning att tekniken är känd? Några rättsfrågor i anledning av Svea hovrätts dom den 18 december 2007 i belysning av EPO-praxis | NIR 3/2009

Does public prior use mean that the invention is made available to the public? Some questions in relation to the decision by the Swedish Svea Court of Appeals of 18 December 2007 in light of EPO case law

Obesvarade frågor runt patent på datorrelaterade uppfinningar och affärsmetoder? | NIR 3/2007

Unanswered questions about patents on computer related inventions and business methods

Presumtionsregel i mål om intrång i förfarandepatent. "Skall vi införa omvänd bevisbörda?" | NIR 1/1994

Burden of Proof in Patent Infringement Cases. "Should We Introduce a Provision on Reverse Burden of Proof"

Debatt. Högsta Domstolen och uppfinningshöjden | NIR 2/1993

The Supreme Court of Sweden and the Inventive Step

Lego-fallet i The Privy Council i England. Upphovsrätt eller ej? | NIR 1/1989

The Lego Case in The Privy Council in England. Copyright or not?

Notiser

Distinctiveness for non-traditional trademarks and the inherent distinctiveness for surface patterns (PMCA, PMÄ 14666-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

In this case regarding a trademark application for a geometrical figure as a surface pattern, the PMCA provide guidelines in relation to distinctiveness in relation to surface trademarks, and particularly the assessment for its inherited distinctiveness. This case further elaborates on the responsibilities an applicant holds in relation to showing distinctiveness for signs, patterns or products that are not typically associated with being trademarks.

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22)

Rättsfall | Sverige

The balance of the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of Estonia and the journalistic interest (the Court of Appeal for Western Sweden, B 5637-22) Filip Jerneke and Stefan Widmark Introduction In this case, two persons were convicted for offence against the law on the peace of the maritime grave at the wreck of the passenger vessel Estonia after diving close to and filming the wreck for the purpose of making a documentary film. In this context, the most interesting aspect is how the court draws the line between the peace of the maritime grave and the journalistic interest.

Gross defamation – similar statements in different media resulting in different judgements (Stockholm District Court, B 568-21 and Svea Court of Appeal B 374-20)

Rättsfall | Sverige

Whether defamation is made in constitutionally protected or other media can have decisive effect. This is shown in two judgments from Stockholm District Court and the Svea Court of Appeal. The cases concern similar statements made relatively close in time by a woman about a man. However, the woman was convicted in one case but acquitted in the other.

Jaguar replica sportscar does not constitute copyright infringement

Rättsfall | Sverige

This case concerns a dispute between international car manufacturer Jaguar and a Swedish company, as well as the company's two owners, regarding allegations of copyright infringement in the defendants' production of a replica Jaguar C-Type sportscar.(1) The second-instance Patent and Market Court of Appeal reversed the first instance-court's decision and found that the replica did not constitute copyright infringement on two unusual grounds:

Till notiser