| p. 103 |
Invändning först efter patentbeslut. Kan detta ha haft inverkan på kravet på uppfinningshöjd vid EPO?
Post-grant-opposition. Can this have an impact on the requirement of inventive step at the EPO?
Catarina Holtz
|
| p. 116 |
Interimistiska förbud vid intrång i läkemedelspatent
Interlocutory injunctions for infringement in pharmaceutical patents
Tom Groop
|
| p. 144 |
Databasrättens föremål i ljuset av nya förhandsavgöranden
The subject matter for the data base protection in light of new preliminary rulings from the European Court of Justice
Johan Axhamn
|
| p. 169 |
Poetry Not in Motion. On the meaning of extraction in the Database Directive by the European Court of Justice
Perttu Virtanen
|
| p. 175 |
Laila, a File Sharing Indulgence Service
Herkko Hietanen, Anniina Huttunen, Heikki Kokkinen
|
| p. 181 |
Cans and canines. On likelihood of confusion and
perception of trademarks
Christian Mosbæk Johannessen
|
| p. 194 |
Fra dansk domspraksis
Danish case law
Eva Aaen Skovbo, Julie Sikker Hansen, Dorte Wahl
|
| p. 200 |
Aftale, registrering og ibrugtagning. Kommentar til
U 2007.2042 H (Asani)
Agreement, registration and use. A comment on the decision by the Danis Supreme Cort in U 2007.2042 H (Asani)
Eva Aaen Skovbo
|
| p. 202 |
Fra dansk domspraksis forts.
Danish case law
Julie Sikker Hansen, Dorte Wahl
|
| p. 206 |
Fra norsk rettspraksis
Norwegian case law
Kaia Bugge Fougner
|
| p. 212 |
Forledet av Huldra? Kommentar til Huldra-dommen (Rt. 2007 s. 1329) I
Seduced by the siren? A comment on the decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court in Rt. 2007 s. 1329
Magnus Stray Vyrje
|
| p. 214 |
Forledet av sceneinstruksjoner, men neppe av huldra. Kommentar til Huldra-dommen (Rt. 2007 s. 1329) II
Seduced by scene instructions, but scarcely by the siren. A comment on the decision by the Norwegian Supreme Court in Rt. 2007 s. 1329q
Ole-Andreas Rognstad
|